Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Marshall v. Linter et al
as 6:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Rickie Charles Marshall, Jr and Rickie Charles Marshall, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay Linter, Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Glenn Roberts
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devra Atwood, Clay Lintner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasper v. Atwood et al
as 6:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Nathan Robert Frank Kasper
Defendant:
Devra Atwood, Clay Linter, Jenny Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Bryant et al
as 6:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Judson Todd Evans
Defendant:
Chris Bryant, Devin Atwood, Turnkey Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bechtol v. Carter County et al
as 6:2023cv00254
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Edward Bechtol
Defendant:
Carter County, Chris Bryant, Harvey Burkhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00342
Petitioner:
Ernest Clay Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kirby v. USA
as 5:2023cv00487
Petitioner:
Clay L Kirby
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cradduck v. Harris et al
as 5:2022cv00827
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cradduck
Defendant:
Stephen Jay Harris and Clay Sander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Hormel et al
as 5:2018cv01256
Defendant:
FNU Boynston, Rick Whitten, W Clay and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
