Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Grandinetti v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Edmund Hyun, Chief Susan Ballard, Dr. Bruce S. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00181
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Taryn Christian v. Clayton Frank, et al
as 17-15460
Petitioner - Appellant:
TARYN CHRISTIAN
Respondent - Appellee:
CLAYTON FRANK, Director, State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety and STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Casella v. Frank et al
as 1:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Casella
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Tommy Johnson, Nolan Espinda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emanuelu Tunoa v. Todd Thomas, et al
as 12-16954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMANUELU TAVITA TUNOA
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD THOMAS, BENJAMIN GRIEGO, JODY BRADLEY and others
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Kenneth Jelks v. Todd Thomas, et al
as 11-16950
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH JELKS
Respondent - Appellee:
TODD THOMAS, Warden, Saguaro Correctional Center and CLAYTON FRANK, Dir., Dept. of Public Safety
Tunoa v. Thomas et al
as 2:2011cv01494
Plaintiff:
Emanuelu Tavita Tunoa
Defendant:
Todd Thomas, Benjamin Griego, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Kealoha v. Frank et al
as 1:2011cv00431
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Kealoha
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and John and Jane Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
