Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ellis v. Hall et al
as 1:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Uknown Gills, Connie Pierce, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Ellis v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EARL ELLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, PHIL BRYANT, SERGEANT BARTEE and others
Ellis v. Epps et al
as 1:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Phil Bryant, Unknown Bartee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00022
Plaintiff:
Charles Galloway
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Officials of Stone County Miss. Corr. Facility, Unknown Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deon Ballard v. Connie Pierce, et al
as 10-60276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON SCOTT BALLARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNIE PIERCE, DEBRA PLATT, RONALD KING and others
Sivori v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Frank Sivori
Defendant:
Emitt Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly, Darlester Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Pierce et al
as 2:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dean Scott Ballard
Defendant:
Connie Pierce, Debra Platt, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Epps et al
as 2:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
George Henry Jones
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
Garry Moore
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mississippi Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
