Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Watson v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2020cv04048
Defendant:
Fato Ki, Correct Care Solutions and Diane York
Plaintiff:
Randy L Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Janovyak et al
as 1:2019cv07104
Defendant:
Jane Does, Deputy Janovyak, Correct Care Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
Quinntin Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruderman v. Prim et al
as 3:2019cv50205
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, CCS, David Devane and others
Plaintiff:
Aleksey Arkadyevich Ruderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Will Co. Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv03251
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Young
Defendant:
Dr. Y. Kim, CCS Correct Care Solutions, Will Co. Adult Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasquez Bautista v. Richardson et al
as 1:2019cv02976
Defendant:
Rozel Elazegui, Bobby Richardson, Contractor and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Velasquez Bautista
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapleton v. Medical Staff et al
as 1:2019cv02562
Defendant:
Major Bondage, Correct Care Solutions, P Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv00425
Defendant:
Ypolito Salinas, "John" Rutherford, Rhonda "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Cassidy J. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reimann v. Templeton et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Jennifer "Doe", LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept., "John" Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Reimann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Santerlli et al
as 1:2018cv07249
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution and Warden Santerlli
Plaintiff:
William H. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nischwitz v. Tazwell County Justice Center Correctional Healthcare
as 1:2018cv01391
Defendant:
Tazwell County Justice Center Correctional Healthcare, Hannah LNU, Tazwell County Sheriffs Dept and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Nischwitz V and Edmond Nischwitz, V
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
