Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Campbell v. State of Oregon
as 6:2022cv01871
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00369
Defendant:
Oregon DHS, State of Oregon, Multnomah County and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. State of Oregon
as 3:2019cv01899
Plaintiff:
Matthew Campbell
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frisby v. Hahn et al
as 3:2019cv00775
Defendant:
Lee Ferguson, Naomi Campbell, Kathy McAlpine and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Roy Frisby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Santiam Correctional Institution
as 6:2018cv00032
Petitioner:
DeShawnte Lamar Campbell
Respondent:
Santiam Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Rosenblum et al
as 2:2016cv01403
Defendant:
Robyn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. Nass et al
as 2:2016cv00582
Defendant:
Roybn M. Anderson, Vicki Applegate, Kelly Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gurule et al v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2011cv01274
Defendant:
Dr. Terry C. Bancroft, C.F.M. Kitchen Manager Gisel Bitterman, Dr. Steven Blum and others
Plaintiff:
Billy D. Davis, Dennis R. Fain, Richard E. Gurule and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Vargo et al
as 3:2010cv00737
Defendant:
Ms. Bonner, Brad Cain, Cpt. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Vargo et al
as 6:2010cv00737
Defendant:
Ms. Bonner, Brad Cain, Cpt. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton L. Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
