Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CHAVEZ ESPINOZA v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Defendant:
MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Respondent:
COLETTE PETERS
Petitioner:
JESUS CHAVEZ ESPINOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chavez v. Arviza
as 1:2024cv00345
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jesus Chavez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CHAVEZ v. WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 3:2020cv00240
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Petitioner:
Jorge Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chavez v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv02171
Plaintiff:
Jorge Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv02531
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Jose Chavez Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, L. J. Oddo, M Magyar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F et al
as 1:2015cv00153
Plaintiff:
JARRON DARVEZ JACKSON
Defendant:
N.O.R.T.A.F./N.O.R.T.U.F, CITY OF EVANSTON, CITY OF ERIE BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2013cv02209
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chavez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Hatten v. Young et al
as 1:2010cv02660
Defendant:
D. Young, W. Zegarski, J. Adimi and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chavez v. Ebbert
as 3:2008cv00369
Petitioner:
Heriberto J. Chavez
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
