Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05268
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, DAVID E DESIDERIO, ASS'T. D.A. DAVID WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2020cv01500
Respondent:
Secretary John Wetzel, District Attorney Lawrence Krasner and Superintendent Jamie Sorber
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01260
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MCADAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2015cv00798
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM MCADAMS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 1:2014cv00395
Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole, Hogue, Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv06247
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL , MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and MARIROSA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Lamas et al
as 3:2010cv02484
Petitioner:
Christopher William Reed
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and Attorney General of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Arthur
as 1:2010cv02325
Petitioner:
Christopher Williams
Respondent:
Arthur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv00694
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Lackawanna County Prison et al
as 4:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
Andre Christopher Williams
Defendant:
Lackawanna County Prison and Janine Donate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
