Cases 1 - 10 of 44
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Waters et al
as 6:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jester Cole McKinney
Defendant:
Kyle Waters, Stacy Slaughter and Sequoyah County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner:
Richard Daly
Respondent:
D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Hamilton
as 5:2023cv01182
Petitioner:
Cole Isaac Phillips
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Fisher et al
as 5:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas
Defendant:
Ross Fisher, Mark Knutson, Cheri Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luginbyhl v. Lawton Corrections Rehabilitation Center et al
as 5:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Defendant:
Lawton Corrections Rehabilitation Center, Oklahoma Department of Corrections, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spears v. Nganga et al
as 5:2023cv00920
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Spears
Defendant:
Ginette Nganga and FNU Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
