Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Colon v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Daniel Danny Colon
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Core Civic et al
as 2:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Daniel Danny Colon
Defendant:
Core Civic and Core Civic Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killingbeck v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 3:2021cv08031
Plaintiff:
Justin S Killingbeck
Defendant:
Tafadzwa P Makarawo, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest #056363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Tony Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earnest #56363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2018cv04226
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Lothrop
as 2:2018cv00793
Petitioner:
Christopher Colon
Respondent:
William Lothrop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Earnest v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2016cv03773
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, Janice K Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon-Arreola v. USA
as 4:2016cv00637
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cristobal Colon-Arreola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Earnest v. Ducey et al
as 2:2015cv01096
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis Earnest
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Clint Hiener, Tony Jose Colon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon-Nales v. Winn
as 4:2014cv02473
Petitioner:
Eduardo Colon-Nales
Respondent:
Louis W Winn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
