Cases 1 - 10 of 1,236
Adib Makdessi v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-7094
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Petitioner:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI
McDonald v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00784
Petitioner:
Lewis L. McDonald
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bullock v. Dotson et al
as 3:2024cv00760
Petitioner:
Timothy Oneal Bullock
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson and Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Gregory v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 24-6992
Respondent:
ROY CHEATAM, Warden and COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE GREGORY
Makdessi v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00672
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Culpeper County et al
as 7:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Eric James Jones
Defendant:
Culpeper County Circuit Court and Commonwealth of Virginia, Culpeper County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barksdale v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00649
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Barksdale
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00571
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv01629
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schuyler Speece v. Hanover County Circuit Court
as 24-6895
Respondent:
HANOVER COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, (Commonwealth of Virginia)
Petitioner:
SCHUYLER A. SPEECE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
