Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Conyers Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Conyers et al
as 5:2018cv00480
Defendant:
Christy Jolly, Correct Care Solution, Stephanie Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Price
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Shelli Conyers Votan and Angela Clifford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 5:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Mark Price
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Stephanie Thompson, Shelli Votaw Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
James Powell
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Stephanie Thompson, Shelli Votaw Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 5:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
Dennis Brock
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, Stephanie Thompson, Shelli Votaw Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Thompson et al
as 0:2016cv00041
Plaintiff:
Howard Stanley
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Thad Manning, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Thompson et al
as 5:2016cv00102
Plaintiff:
Howard Stanley
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Thad Manning, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Crall et al
as 5:2014cv00465
Plaintiff:
John Rose
Defendant:
Doug Crall, Richard Rhee, Shelli Conyers Votaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Bottom et al
as 5:2014cv00417
Plaintiff:
B.R.S. , H.M.J.S. and Rebecca Marie Lindsey
Defendant:
Don Bottom , Rick Rowlette , Correctcare - Integrated Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
