Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Clifton Walker
Defendant:
Sherburne County, Sherburne County Jail, Brain Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldmann et al v. Sherburne County Sheriffs Department et al
as 0:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
Steven Goldmann, Romelle Smith, Mohamed Hussein and others
Defendant:
Sherburne County Sheriffs Department, Joel Brott, Donald Starry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisherman v. Minnesota
as 0:2021cv00735
Petitioner:
Corey E. Fisherman
Respondent:
Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evenstad v. Klavins et al
as 0:2020cv01119
Defendant:
Ramsey County, Derek Weinke, Jennifer Schuster-Jaeger and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Evenstad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisherman v. West
as 0:2019cv00180
Respondent:
Tig West and Ti G. West
Petitioner:
Corey E Fisherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bevins v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2018cv02428
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Corey Victor Bevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fogg v. USA
as 0:2017cv05353
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Corey Vampelt Fogg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2017cv05264
Plaintiff:
Calvin Thomas King
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, D.O.C., Lindsey Jennelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Anderson et al
as 0:2017cv05196
Petitioner:
Calvin Thomas King
Respondent:
Corey Anderson , Amanda Anthony , Jeff Austrong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
