Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Woodland v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00482
Petitioner:
Corey Woodland
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. Matushak et al
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Hooks
Defendant:
Rachel Matushak, James A Elsinger, John Kind and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney, Michael v. Cromwell, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Kearney
Defendant:
Daniel Cromwell, Corey Rahlf, Sheldon Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. York et al
as 2:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Corey Benson
Defendant:
C York, L Wilson, R Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner, Michael v. Taylor County et al
as 3:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Ledell Turner
Defendant:
Taylor County, Sheriff Larry Woebbeking, Chief Deputy Corey Dassow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodland v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Corey Woodland
Defendant:
Christine Ross, Dionna Clemmons and Neil Thoreson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sebish et al
as 2:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Clarence J Wilson
Defendant:
Corey Sebish and Capt Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Haziga, et al
as 1:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Corey Jerome Howell
Defendant:
P Haziga, RN, Terry R Dulle, Joan M Hunnula, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Corey v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2022cv00533
Petitioner:
Corey Anthony Jones
Respondent:
Warden R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martinez v. McDermott et al
as 2:2022cv00992
Plaintiff:
Jorge Martinez
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, John or Jane Doe, Jon Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
