Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Green, et al
as 0:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Allen Wiley II and Allen Wiley, III
Defendant:
David Green, Nicholas Cleverger, Tyler Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Franklin County, Kentucky et al
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Austin
Defendant:
Franklin County, Kentucky, Chris Quire, Nathan M. Doty and others
Debtor:
John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Herrin et al
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Justin Curry
Defendant:
Lt. Kathy Herrin, P.O. M. Johnson, P.O. Hyahwahnah Outland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry et al v. Gregory et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Rachael Hester, Leonta Gorham, Nathaniel Lamb and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry and Craig Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter et al v. Brady et al
as 4:2020cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jobe, Kevin Williamson, Jamar Boyd and others
Defendant:
Amy Brady, Leslie Gibson, William Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Harmon et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry
Defendant:
Andrew Cooper, Jarrod Borden and Stephen Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunello et al v. Limbalm et al
as 3:2019cv00571
Plaintiff:
Brian Casey, Tirrell Barbour and Michael Brunello
Defendant:
Allan New, Josh Limbalm, David Kineline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv00197
Plaintiff:
Micheal Curry
Defendant:
B.J. Burkhart, Mitch Miller and Dillon Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry and Micheal Curry
Defendant:
B.J. Burkhart, Mitch Miller and Dillon Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
