Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Curry v. Everly et al
as 3:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Valerie Sams and Patricia Everly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Pullins et al
as 3:2024cv00739
Defendant:
Kiarra Byrd, Jason Smiley, M Battle and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. SCHILLING et al
as 1:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
RACHAEL SCHILLING, HANNAH WINNINGHAM, J. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARAFONOV v. NWOSISI et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
ANDREY M FARAFONOV
Defendant:
IFUNEAYA LICHENA NWOSISI, RYAN WILSON MEARS, MICHELL WAYMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. NORTON et al
as 2:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
NORTON and LAWSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. FRANCO et al
as 1:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
MIGUEL FRANCO, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INC., CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETRO v. SHELBYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv02474
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. PETRO, JR.
Defendant:
SHELBYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, BART SMITH, CHARLES CURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Defendant:
Tyree L Carr, Christopher Brautzsch, Jeremy Nicodemus and others
Plaintiff:
Donte Curry
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
