Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Vance et al
as 1:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Joseph Garcia
Respondent:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallo v. Vance et al
as 1:2021cv10488
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mallo
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Emily Bradford and Jerrold Steigman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walden v. The City of New York and Municipality of New York County et al
as 1:2021cv00785
Plaintiff:
John Walden
Defendant:
The City of New York and Municipality of New York County, District Attorney Office of New York City, Detective James Meehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv09243
Defendant:
The City of New York, Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Lisa Franchini and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nieves v. Farber et al
as 1:2020cv05886
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Curtis J. Farber, Police Officer James Marcinek, The United States Federal Government and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Park et al
as 1:2020cv05353
Defendant:
Jung A. Park, Natasha Lapiner-Giresi, Ameer Beeno and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newman v. Vance
as 1:2020cv01416
Petitioner:
Maurice Newman
Respondent:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nieves v. Farber et al
as 1:2020cv00990
Defendant:
Fire Marshal Phillip Meager, Honorable Judge Curtis J. Farber, Brandon Riddle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Nieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. VANCE et al
as 5:2019cv00428
Defendant:
DAVID YOUNG, POLICE OFFICER DEFRANCO and CYRUS R VANCE, JR
Plaintiff:
DANA KYLE KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
