Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chanh Trinh et al v. Brian Birkholz et al
as 2:2023cv04521
Plaintiff:
Chanh V. Trinh, Brian E. Sawyers, Dennis McPherson and others
Defendant:
Brian Birkholz, Bureau of Prisons, Law Office of Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Beaton v. Valley State Prison
as 1:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
Paul Nivard Beaton
Defendant:
Valley State Prison and D Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elijah Lee Miller v. Josef D. Miller et al
as 5:2018cv02608
Plaintiff:
Elijah Lee Miller
Defendant:
Patrica A. Miller and Josef D. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacob Andrew Bergeron v. Nathan Deal et al
as 2:2016cv01274
Petitioner:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Respondent:
Nathan Deal, Garrison, Theodore Jackson and others
Miller v. People of the State of California, Sacramento County
as 2:2015cv01059
Petitioner:
Richard D. Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California, Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. People of the State of California, Sacramento County
as 1:2015cv02120
Petitioner:
Richard D. Miller, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California, Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mckenzie v. Miller et al
as 5:2014cv04890
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Mckenzie
Defendant:
D. Miller, C. Nguyen and Yamileth Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnston v. Miller et al
as 2:2011cv03274
Plaintiff:
Tyler Johnston
Defendant:
Rachel D Miller, Jessica Windham and Douglas Phimister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Dean Miller v. Motor Vehicle Division et al
as 2:2010cv06432
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Miller
Defendant:
Motor Vehicle Division, Stacey K Stanton, Stacey K Stanton and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
