Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jordan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections (S.C.D.C.) Office of Investigations and Intelligence (O.I.I.) et al
as 1:2023cv04720
Petitioner:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Respondent:
South Carolina Department of Corrections (S.C.D.C.) Office of Investigations and Intelligence (O.I.I.), Matt Watson and Richard A. Darling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Darling et al
as 2:2023cv01137
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
Richard M. Darling, Deparment of Corrections Division Office of Investigations and Intelligence (O.I.I.) and S.C. Department of Corrections Division Office of Investigations and Intelligence (O.I.I.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jordan v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv03521
Plaintiff:
Joshua Bryan Jordan
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Richard A. Darling, South Carolina Department of Corrections (SCDC) Office of Investigations and Intelligence (OII) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Anthony v. Branch et al
as 4:2021cv01360
Defendant:
Lt. Branch, Jail Adminstrator, Dorchester County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ray Anthony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Wimberly et al
as 6:2020cv00198
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyrone Bennett
Defendant:
Major Darling, Dr Wimberly, Dr Richter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sansbury v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 5:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
Rodney Sansbury
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Nurse Shelton, JC Miers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Dorchester County Detention Center et al
as 0:2011cv01325
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Mallick Holmes
Defendant:
Dorchester County Detention Center, T A Van Doran and Richard Darling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches v. Darling et al
as 6:2008cv01467
Defendant:
Ron Darling, Buck Martinez and Chip Caray
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
