Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harris v. Suffolk County Corr. Facility et al
as 2:2023cv06839
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
Suffolk County Corr. Facility, Yamphank Medical Unit and Yamphank Corr. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Champ v. Hendry County Board of County Commissioners, Florida et al
as 2:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Mitchell Wills, Carson Turner, Michael Swindle and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Phillip Champ and Inmates of Hendry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champ et al v. Hendry County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Mitchell Wills, Carson Turner, Michael Swindle and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Phillip Champ and Inmates of Hendry County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pugh v. Elmore et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Pugh
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, John Lloyd, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pimentel et al
as 1:2013cv01390
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
R. Pimentel, J.D. Lozano and Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Pimentel, et al.
as 1:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
R. Pimentel, J. D. Lozano and S. Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Gipson et al
as 1:2012cv01753
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Marlene Smith, Ben Albitre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Suffolk County Correctional Facility
as 2:2012cv02753
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
Suffolk County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Harris v. Connie Gipson
as 5:2012cv00351
Defendant:
Connie Gipson
Petitioner:
Darrell Harris
Harris v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv04666
Plaintiff:
Darrell Harris
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
