Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
David Davis v. Fredeane Artis
as 24-1179
Petitioner: DAVID DOUGLAS DAVIS
Respondent: FREDEANE ARTIS, Warden
Soi v. Harpe
as 23-5021
Petitioner / Appellant: DAVID DOUGLAS SOI
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN HARPE, Director of Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Soi v. Crow We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00224
Petitioner: David Douglas Soi
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zhiriakov v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03141
Respondent: Chad Wolf, Richard Dorneker, William Barr and others
Petitioner: Oleg Zhiriakov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moreno-Bastidas v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03137
Respondent: Chad Wolf, Richard Dorneker, William Barr and others
Petitioner: Carlos F. Moreno-Bastidas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bataineh v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv03132
Respondent: Chad Wolf, Richard Dorneker, William Barr and others
Petitioner: Khaled Bataineh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lindsey v. Sarhani et al
as 7:2017cv00167
Plaintiff: Kemuel Lindsey
Defendant: M Sarhani, Brian Jones, David Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. USA
as 3:2016cv00139
Petitioner: David Douglas Avery
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heath v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00541
Petitioner: David Douglas Heath
Respondent: Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Moeller v. Margaret Gilbert
as 14-35886
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID DOUGLAS MOELLER
Respondent - Appellee: MARGARET GILBERT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?