Cases 1 - 10 of 22
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven James Gomez v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02635
Plaintiff:
Steven James Gomez, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Rachel Krause, Linda Borsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNOWDEN v. LANIER et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Petitioner:
STEVEN THOMAS SNOWDEN
Respondent:
JUDGE HEATHER H LANIER, TRE MCLENDON, RUSSELL WENG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Superior Court of Bulloch County et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Rodricus D. Scott
Defendant:
Superior Court of Bulloch County, Bulloch County Sheriff Office/Bulloch County Jail, Judge June Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daker v. Bland et al
as 6:2020cv00090
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Gena Hutcheson, Sherry Bland and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Head et al
as 1:2020cv03690
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Freddie Davis, James Demetrius Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBB v. HOWARD et al
as 4:2019cv00070
Defendant:
RICKY BOREN, JOHN BAILEY, AMANDA HOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
JIMMY COBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAFFER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00459
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, DEBBIE OXLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
