Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 2:2023cv02137
Plaintiff:
Christian Pitts
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Wellpath Healthcare Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Fish et al
as 3:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunlap
Defendant:
Robin Fish, Lakeia Wells, f/n/u Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Genovese et al
as 1:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Kevin Genovese, John Doe #1, Gary Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shotwell v. Drewery et al
as 2:2019cv02751
Defendant:
Kersey, Phil Drewery, Jr., Jason Drewery and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Shotwell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Jennifer Williams, Arvil Chapman, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadnot v. Farrow et al
as 3:2018cv00248
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hadnot
Defendant:
Eric Farrow, Jane Doe, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Watson et al
as 1:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond Cox
Defendant:
Eric Watson, John Beavers, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
