Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Drake v. USA
as 1:2024cv00153
Petitioner:
Jalen S Drake
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phillips v. Indiana CT State of et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana CT State of, Stephanie Steele, Andrew A Krumwied and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
Jermaine A Drake and Jermaine Drake
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUFF v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00159
Defendant:
CUPP, MIKAYLA DRAKE, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IAN HUFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2020cv02939
Defendant:
JOSHUA HOUNSHELL, CINDY WEISNER, MATHEW MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MICHEAL BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VARCADIPANE v. ALBRIGHT et al
as 2:2020cv00208
Plaintiff:
LEONARD VARCADIPANE
Defendant:
ALBRIGHT, VAHANN and M. DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 3:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00521
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Fields, Eric Jordan, Kyle Johnson and others
Defendant:
Corporal Sugar, Priscella, B Stitnicky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COMSTOCK v. OWENS et al
as 1:2019cv02369
Defendant:
ANGELA OWENS, DRAKE MADDIX, VELTON and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA AARON COMSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers et al v. Nevels et al
as 1:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Ken Faulk, Greg Zoeller, Reggie Nevels and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Flowers, Jonny Drake and Wheel Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
