Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Abdikarim v. Wilson et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Zakariya Abdikarim
Defendant:
Dan Wilson, Drew Corwin, Tanner Corwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rockefeller v. Cass County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Royal C. Rockefeller
Defendant:
Cass County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Jesse Jahner, Captain Frobig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks v. Jaquith et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dustin Hendricks
Defendant:
Shandra Jaquith, Ramsey County, Lake Region Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fly v. United States et al
as 1:2018cv00063
Plaintiff:
William Anthony Fly
Defendant:
United States, United States Department of Justice, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett v. Marks et al
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Tilmer Everett
Defendant:
Roger Marks, III, Dean Clarkson, Dan Donlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2017cv00095
Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Thompson
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Attorney General of North Dakota, North Dakota State Crime Laboratory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olafson v. Schulz et al
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Olafson
Defendant:
Ann Schulz, Wanda Bear, Cindy Splee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holbach v. Murphy et al
as 4:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mitchell David Holbach
Defendant:
Nancy Murphy, Dan Strandberg, Kristen Plessas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Curtis et al v. State of North Dakota
as 3:2007cv00078
Petitioner:
Ed Curtis, Dan Curtis and Shane Curtis
Defendant:
State of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
