Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Morena v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv04221
Petitioner:
Luis Hernandez Morena
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morena v. Danforth
as 5:2024cv00069
Petitioner:
Luis Hernandez Morena
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
William Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins et al v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Rufus Washington, Tim Aiken, Billy Grissle and others
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson Mickens, Jr. v. William Danforth
as 24-12187
Plaintiff:
NELSON MICKENS, JR.
Defendant:
WILLIAM DANFORTH
Chapman v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00059
Defendant:
Mr. Hall, Paul Johnson, Cody Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Trevon DeShon Chapman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Coffee Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2024cv00054
Defendant:
Warden Danforth, Assistant Warden Stone and Coffee Correctional Facility
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Evans, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v.DANFORTH et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Petitioner:
RODERICK BO JACKSON
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and WILLIAM DANFORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Freeman v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv03028
Respondent:
William Danforth
Petitioner:
Christopher T. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannon v. Danforth et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Cannon
Defendant:
William Danforth and Paul Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Danforth
as 1:2024cv00985
Petitioner:
Ronald B. Gray
Respondent:
Lt. Danforth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
