Cases 1 - 9 of 9
De La Cruz Jimenez v. USA
as 2:2021cv04053
Plaintiff:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz Jimenez
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jimenez v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00626
Defendant:
Mark Swafford, Michael Carvajal, Rodney Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rafael De La Cruz-Jimenez v. USA
as 17-11775
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAFAEL DANIEL DE LA CRUZ-JIMENEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
De La Cruz-Jimenez v. United States of America
as 0:2014cv61221
Plaintiff:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz-Jimenez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
De La Cruz-Jimenez v. DC/Federal Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv00254
Plaintiff:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz-Jimenez
Defendant:
DC/Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Ronnie Holt, Cameron Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DE LA CRUZ - MENDEZ v. KEISLER et al
as 2:2007cv05426
Petitioner:
DANIEL DE LA CRUZ - MENDEZ
Respondent:
PETER D. KEISLER, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JULIE L. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRUZ-JIMENEZ v. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007cv01690
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL DANIEL DE LA CRUZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, INS/OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ-JIMENEZ v. DC/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2007cv01654
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL DANIEL DE LA CRUZ-JIMENEZ
Defendant:
DC/FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, RONNIE HOLT, CAMERON LINDSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De La Cruz Jimenez v. Holt
as 3:2007cv01304
Petitioner:
Rafael Daniel De La Cruz Jimenez
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
