Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Logan v. State of New York DOCCS et al
as 1:2022cv08902
Plaintiff:
Joseph Logan
Defendant:
State of New York DOCCS, Department of Corrections Defendants, DR. Dar Qutubuddin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Mario Sanchez, Anne Darring, Ralph Willis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Paxton et al
as 3:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Ralph Willis, Joseph McDevett, Amber Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Darring et al
as 3:2021cv00117
Defendant:
Jaime Rawlinson, Tammy Cisernos, Galveston County Sheriff Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. State Bar of Texas Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel et al
as 3:2021cv00114
Defendant:
Warren Paxton, Tammy Cisernos, Ralph Willis and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Office of Attorney General - Child Support Division et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Searcy
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Interactive Services, Ralph Willis, Casa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Toney et al
as 2:2019cv01950
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Deborah Toney
Petitioner:
James Dar-Rell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonner v. Darring et al
as 3:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
Ryan Rydell Bonner
Defendant:
Anne B Darring, Jack Roady and Galveston Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
