Cases 1 - 10 of 19
LEE v. WELLPATH
as 2:2023cv01682
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER v. WARDEN S. BUZZINOTTI
as 2:2020cv01684
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE WALKER, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN S. BUZZINOTTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2019cv00287
Defendant:
Hugh Hurwitz, The Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
David Lee Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JABLONSKY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2016cv01199
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE JABLONSKY
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPIKES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03494
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SPIKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FISHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02100
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE FISHER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Durachko v. Lamas et al
as 3:2013cv01731
Petitioner:
David Lee Durachko
Respondent:
Marirosa Lamas and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Reitz et al
as 1:2012cv01452
Plaintiff:
David Lee Baker
Defendant:
Earl Reitz, Alleman, Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2011cv04667
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SERVICES, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN INC., TEMPLE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv04349
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE ROBINSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA COUNTY PRISON SYSTEM and CURRAN FRUMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
