Cases 1 - 10 of 49
DEJESUS v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv03626
Petitioner:
JOSE JAVIER DEJESUS
Respondent:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF DELAWARE COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv01347
Plaintiff:
Jesus Dejesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
J. Franklin and SUPERINTENDENT Ramson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GONZALEZ v. FRANKLIN et al
as 2:2023cv02986
Plaintiff:
JESUS DEJESUS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
J. FRANKLIN and SUPERINTENDENT RAMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeJesus v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexis DeJesus
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Henry DeJesus Morales
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Baraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeJesus v. Stinehart et al
as 4:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Alejandro DeJesus
Defendant:
John Stinehart, Courtney Rodgers, Jenna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
as 2:2021cv02160
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER DEJESUS
Plaintiff:
AARON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 2:2021cv00852
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and Warden of SCI-Mahanoy
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeJesus v. Warden of SCI-Mahanoy et al
as 4:2021cv00303
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Mahanoy
Petitioner:
Alejandro DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEJESUS-LOZADA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv02944
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
FELIX DEJESUS-LOZADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
