Cases 1 - 10 of 15
MEREDITH v. WILLIAMSON et al
as 2:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MEREDITH
Defendant:
JORDAN GRAY WILLIAMSON, Desmond Raheem McFadden, JAMES ALAN SWAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. McCullough et al
as 5:2023cv03368
Plaintiff:
Osha A Johnson
Defendant:
Lieutenant Marquita McCullough, Lieutenant Christopher Timmons, Lieutenant Desmond Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Allen v. Columbia, City of et al
as 3:2023cv01783
Plaintiff:
Desmond Denzel Allen
Defendant:
Columbia, City of, Columbia Police Dep't and Nicholas Q. Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Cromer v. Richland County et al
as 2:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
Desmond Cromer
Defendant:
Richland County, Marcus A. Burnette, Signeous Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterson v. Barnes
as 4:2021cv00725
Respondent:
Nanette Barnes
Petitioner:
Steven Desmond Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peterson v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv03598
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FCI Bennettsville
Petitioner:
Steven Desmond Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hewitt v. Young et al
as 6:2019cv01927
Defendant:
C Brown, Sergeant Murphy, Nurse Penny and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hewitt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Carter et al
as 9:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Chief W. Beatty, Sgt. K. Carter and Capt. A. Grant
Plaintiff:
Silvester Desmond Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Mallick et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Plaintiff:
Silvester Desmond Scott
Defendant:
Todd Mallick, R Gamard, C Harkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Metcalf v. Fuller et al
as 2:2013cv03197
Plaintiff:
Desmond Metcalf
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller, John and Jane Does, Michael L Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
