Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Miller v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-11514
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
MICHEAL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MILLER v. DIXON
as 4:2022cv00354
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEVON MILLER
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2020cv01130
Petitioner:
Arseles Devon Miller
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Turman et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Scotts Racks, Andalusia Health Care, Johnny Loyd and others
Plaintiff:
Scotty Devon Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Superintendent of the Shawangunk Correctional Facility
as 1:2018cv01762
Petitioner:
Devon Miller
Respondent:
Superintendent of the Shawangunk Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Ficarrotta et al
as 8:2017cv00790
Petitioner:
Arseles Devon Miller
Respondent:
Ronald Ficarrotta, Jane Doe Ficarrotta, Mark A. Ober and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arseles Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corre
as 16-11208
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARSELES DEVON MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Miller v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2016cv00442
Petitioner:
Arseles Devon Miller
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
