Cases 1 - 10 of 842
Waddle v. Kosciusko County Sheriff et al
as 3:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Gage Waddle
Defendant:
Kosciusko County Sheriff, Sgt. Dan Mesa, Jake Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE v. KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
DETRIC O. DOE
Defendant:
KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, LLC., GEO GROUP INC, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAYLOR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
JAMES SAYLOR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN DOE, MADISON GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAYNE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
NICK D. PAYNE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, IDOC, C.I.C. PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
