Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Carty v. Pennsylvania Parole Board et al
as 1:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Carty
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Parole Board and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Anderson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBride et al v. Ya'cup et al
as 1:2019cv02404
Defendant:
John P. Lonergan, James E. Shadid, Brian L. Bernston and others
Plaintiff:
Englewood Tp. Corp. and Dytaniel L. McBride
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fessler v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00445
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Fessler
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fessler v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00443
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Fessler
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Fessler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson, Donald v. Bround, Thomas et al
as 3:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Wilson
Defendant:
Thomas H. Bround , David Schwartz and Mindy Sownewtag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson, Donald v. Bround et al
as 3:2013cv00781
Petitioner:
Donald Charles Wilson
Respondent:
Thomas H. Bround , David H. Schwarz and Mindy Sonnentag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson, Donald v. Gaanan, Carlo
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Wilson
Defendant:
Carlo Gaanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson, Donald v. Hamblin, Gary et al
as 3:2011cv00725
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Wilson
Defendant:
Gary Hamblin , Karen E. Timberlake , Thomas H. Bowd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fessler v. O'Brien
as 4:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Donald Charles Fessler
Defendant:
Ed O'Brien
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
