Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Hunt v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hunt
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, DEPUTY WARDEN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
ARRINGTON v. MASON ET AL
as 1:2022cv00331
Petitioner:
JAMES K. ARRINGTON
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, JUDGE JOHN J. MEAD, EMILY C. DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01831
Plaintiff:
Rafael Santos
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kevin Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dowdall et al v. Downs Racing, L.P. et al
as 3:2019cv01419
Plaintiff:
Coleen Dowdall, Phoenix Rising Stables, LLC, Michael Dowdall and others
Defendant:
Downs Racing, L.P. and Anthony Marchelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOWNES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01425
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALAN DOWNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hitner v. John Doe I et al
as 1:2018cv02008
Defendant:
Captain Scott Downs, John Doe II and John Doe I
Plaintiff:
Clinton Hitner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Downs v. Baltazar et al
as 1:2017cv01007
Petitioner:
Deangelo Jerome Downs
Respondent:
J. Baltazar, United States Penitentiary Canaan and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Doty v. Miller et al
as 3:2016cv02340
Plaintiff:
Christopher Doty
Defendant:
G. Miller, J. Meintel, K. Czopak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. FRACKVILLE PRISON et al
as 3:2016cv02104
Plaintiff:
WALTER OLA SCOTT
Defendant:
FRACKVILLE PRISON, KRAYNAKS, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE L. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. FRACKVILLE PRISON et al
as 2:2016cv04705
Plaintiff:
WALTER OLA SCOTT
Defendant:
FRACKVILLE PRISON, KRAYNAKS, HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE L. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
