Cases 1 - 10 of 19
WALLACE v. IRWIN et al
as 3:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDANT RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY J. BLICHA, LT. S. KOPCHICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. MCLAIN et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
MARLON GLENN
Defendant:
C.O. MCLAIN, C.O. GUARNEIRI, C.O. MANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. MCLAIN et al
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
MARLON GLENN
Defendant:
C.O. MCLAIN, C.O. GUARNEIRI, C.O. MANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TYSON v. DUFFY et al
as 2:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
TIA TYSON
Defendant:
SHAUN DUFFY and MATTHEW P LALLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duffis v. Thompson
as 3:2023cv00496
Petitioner:
Linero Duffis
Respondent:
Rachael Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRAMER v. DUFFY et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Defendant:
SGT. MROZEK and LT. DUFFY
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRAMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Edrington v. Mahally et al
as 3:2016cv02339
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lee Edrington
Defendant:
Larry Mahally, Rebecca Mooney, C.J. McKeown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2015cv01431
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
