Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Wall v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00436
Petitioner:
Dustin Alan Wall
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brislan #164993 v. Laughner et al
as 2:2024cv01812
Plaintiff:
Dustin Leroy Brislan
Defendant:
Unknown Parties and Gregg Laughner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Fulton et al
as 2:2023cv02483
Plaintiff:
Dustin Ford
Defendant:
Unknown Fulton, Unknown McAnerny and Payson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudkins v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Dustin Hudkins
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mogler et al v. Peters et al
as 2:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Native American Ceremonial Drums Group, Stanley Dashee, Nicholas Lister and others
Defendant:
Collette Peters, RA Heisner and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Crouch #321149 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2023cv08007
Petitioner:
Dustin D Crouch
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wall v. Colbert
as 4:2022cv00448
Petitioner:
Dustin Alan Wall
Respondent:
Danon Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reeder v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv00395
Plaintiff:
Dustin Paul Reeder
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, David K Byers and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dingle v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv02038
Petitioner:
Dustin Allen Dingle
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henderson v. Lopez, et al
as 2:2021cv01563
Plaintiff:
Dustin Henderson
Defendant:
C Lopez, D Mendoza, Lillian Dauod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
