Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Stout v. Page et al
as 5:2016ct03161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stout, Jr.
Defendant:
E.B. Page and Cary Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Ballard
Defendant:
Marcellus Buchanan, Don Gast, Martin Reidinger and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. United States et al
as 5:2014ct03060
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jomell Perry
Defendant:
United States, George E.B. Holding, Yvonne V. Watford-Mckinney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartko v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2014ct03043
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bartko
Defendant:
Clay Campbell Wheeler, Scott B. Hollenbeck, George E.B. Holding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTKO v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2013cv01006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BARTKO
Defendant:
CLAY CAMPBELL WHEELER, SCOTT B. HOLLENBECK, GEORGE E.B. HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Holding et al
as 5:2013ct03208
Plaintiff:
Walter D. Boykin, Jr.
Defendant:
George E.B. Holding, Jim Johnston, Lucy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saeku v. Holder et al
as 5:2012ct03041
Plaintiff:
Somsak Saeku
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Department of Treasury, Terrence W. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barefoot v. Holding et al
as 5:2008hc02179
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Respondent:
George E.B. Holding and Eric David Goulian
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Barefoot v. Goulian et al
as 5:2008ct03162
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric David Goulian, George E.B. Holding, Arthur F. Beeler and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Barefoot v. Holding et al
as 5:2008ct03159
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
George E.B. Holding, Eric David Goulian, Steven Babbits and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
