Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Crago #115357 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell and Derric Keaton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crago #115357 v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crago #115357 v. Pitz
as 2:2019cv04532
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Joseph Pitz, Berry Larson and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Crago, Jr. v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-16469
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Crago v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv02007
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crago v. Ryan et al
as 4:2012cv00176
Petitioner:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crago v. Clark et al
as 2:2011cv02368
Plaintiff:
Earl Felton Crago, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Clark and Unknown Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Crago, Jr. v. Dora Schriro, et al
as 10-16531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director of the ADC at ADC Central Office, GREG FIZER, Warden. ASPC Tucson, STEVE WORTMAN, Maintenance Supervisor, ASPC Tucson and others
Earl Crago, Jr. v. R. Teed, et al
as 09-15431
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
R. TEED, Correctional Officer II, Arizona Department of Corrections
Defendant:
H. SCHLEMBACH, Deputy, Pinal County Sheriff's Department
Earl Crago, Jr. v. Dora Schriro
as 09-15260
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARL FELTON CRAGO, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
DORA B. SCHRIRO, Director (A.D.O.C)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
