Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Bracero v. Rendell et al
as 3:2010cv01727
Petitioner:
Carlos Bracero
Respondent:
Edward G Rendell, Court of Comon Pleas of Northumberland County, PA, District Attorney of Northumberland County, PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LYNCH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA et al
as 2:2010cv02472
Plaintiff:
JOHN J LYNCH, SR
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNA, EDWARD G RENDELL, THE PENNA DEPT OF TRANEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELLS v. RENDELL, et al
as 2:2009cv01705
Petitioner:
MARC WELLS
Respondent:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv01579
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY QUINDERZ SMITH
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHRIES et al v. DUTRIELLE et al
as 2:2009cv01325
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUMPHRIES, JERMAIN DUTRIELLE, NATHAN HACK and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMPHRIES v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv01211
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUMPHRIES
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL and THOMAS CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CARRASQUILLO v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2009cv00347
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARRASQUILLO
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUTTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE SUTTON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WESLEY v. GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
as 3:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant:
GOVERNOR EDWARD G. RENDELL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
