Cases 1 - 10 of 31
HERSH v. MCFADDEN
as 2:2020cv03315
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HERSH
Respondent:
WARDEB EDWARD MCFADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERSH v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2020cv03197
Respondent:
GEORGE ROBERTS, SCOTT REYNOLDS and D EDWARD MCFADDEN
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER M. HERSH, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KYLE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2020cv00636
Defendant:
EDWARD MCFADDEN, KAREN MURPHY, DOCTOR VICTORIA GESSNER and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEROY KYLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. DOE-HERNANDEZ et al
as 2:2019cv02531
Defendant:
NURSE ASHLEY HARRINGTON, NURSE JOHN DOE, CHESTER COUNTY PRISON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK et al v. DOE-WALKER et al
as 2:2019cv02235
Defendant:
MARSHA DOE, JOHN DOE-WALKER, JOHN DOE-HAWKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAUCHER v. THE MUNICIPALITY OF CHESTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2019cv01728
Defendant:
C.O. WALLS, DIRECTOR GEORGE ROBERTS, THE MUNICIPALITY OF CHESTER COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC W. MAUCHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04761
Defendant:
LPN MARKELLE POWELL, PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WARDEN D. EDWARD MCFADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
BRENTON A. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. DOE-MOORE et al
as 2:2018cv04395
Defendant:
CORPORAL JOHN DOE-MOORE, CO1 JOHN DOE DORLEY, SERGEANT JOHN DOE TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2018cv01350
Plaintiff:
MARKUS JAMES THOMAS
Defendant:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, ROY HAMILTON, GEORGE YOUNG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv03672
Petitioner:
JUSTIN CREDICO
Respondent:
D. EDWARD MCFADDEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF CHESTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
