Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Marshall v. Mihalik et al
as 1:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Marshall
Defendant:
Ryan Mihalik, Terrell Ellis, Brice Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ellis
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Hawkins v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
Ellis Earl Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ellis
Defendant:
United States of America, Evertt Cottrell, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coler v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coler
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Newman et al v. Smith County, Texas et al
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Newman, Latosha Newman, Joyce Newman and others
Defendant:
Smith County, Texas, Sheriff Larry R Smith, John Shoemaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
