Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Lynch v. USA
as 7:2024cv01219
Petitioner:
Roger Earl Lynch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Manning v. Mueller
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
George Earl Manning
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff Steve Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Rice v. Warden Joseph et al
as 0:2023cv05262
Plaintiff:
Reginald Rice, Sr. and Reginald Earl Rice, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Joseph and FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hurrell v. Kendall
as 5:2023cv03556
Petitioner:
Tashon Earl Hurrell
Respondent:
Brian Kendall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. South Carolina Department of Corrections of Manning CI
as 9:2023cv02656
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Campbell
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections of Manning CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mitchell v. USA
as 3:2023cv02123
Petitioner:
Leonard Earl Mitchell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Richardson v. J. Reuben Long Detention Center et al
as 4:2023cv01586
Plaintiff:
James Earl Richardson
Defendant:
J. Reuben Long Detention Center and Cooks Industries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Morton v. Greenwood County Detention Center
as 4:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
Dennis Earl Morton, III
Defendant:
Greenwood County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rice v. Barnes
as 0:2022cv00218
Petitioner:
Reginald Earl Rice
Respondent:
Nanette Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Williams et al v. Colclough et al
as 6:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hunt Williams and April Garner
Defendant:
Terrance Colclough, Lhoman Mays, Nelson Rosario and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
