Cases 1 - 10 of 23
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COMBS v. ELIS et al
as 1:2023cv01759
Plaintiff:
DANNY TYLER COMBS
Defendant:
ELIS, REAGLE, BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2022cv01187
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RANDY TAYLOR, CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lundy v. Gruber et al
as 3:2022cv00247
Plaintiff:
Paul D Lundy
Defendant:
Jason Gruber, Eon Johnson, Eli Shellden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELY v. OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2019cv00273
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROTHERS, OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN L. ELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARVEY v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2018cv00180
Plaintiff:
ELY WAYNE HARVEY
Defendant:
ALLEN and BRANCHVILLE COR. FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEYTON v. PFIZER et al
as 2:2017cv00421
Defendant:
ANGELA DEWEESE, ELI LILLY & CO., IU MEDICAL CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR E. PEYTON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILLEGAS V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00286
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
ISAAC ELI VILLEGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
VILLEGAS v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00177
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Petitioner:
ISAAC ELI VILLEGAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JAMES v. ELI et al
as 1:2013cv00541
Defendant:
LORENZO ELI and NICOLAS P. VILLANUSTRE
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
