Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Priestor v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv07039
Plaintiff:
David Priestor
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Clerks, Clerk of the United States Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deberry v. Spitzer et al
as 12-2654
Petitioner - Appellant:
Eric Deberry
Respondent - Appellee:
Elliot Spitzer, New York State Attorney General and Dale Artis, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
Pacheco v. Pataki
as 10-4461
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Milton Musa Pacheco
Defendant:
George B. Alexander, Debra Loomis, Patricia Tappan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George Pataki, Elliot Spitzer, Anthony G. Ellis and others
Hawthorne v. Spitzer
as 10-4324
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rudolph Hawthorne
Respondent - Appellee:
Elliot Spitzer
Jamison v. Senkowski
as 10-3035
Petitioner - Appellant:
John Jamison
Respondent - Appellee:
Daniel Senkowski, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner D.O.C.S. and Elliot Spitzer, N.Y.S. Atty. General
Frederick Rolle v. USA, et al
as 10-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID G. LARIMER, MARION W. PAYSON and others
Tucker v. NY Pol Dept, et al
as 10-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON TUCKER
Defendant - Appellee:
NY POL DEPT, STEVEN, New York Police Detective, THOMAS, New York Police Det. and others
Cardoza v. Rock et al
as 1:2008cv08210
Petitioner:
William Cardoza
Respondent:
David Rock and Elliot Spitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tinsley v. Kavaner et al
as 1:2008cv05976
Plaintiff:
Larry Tinsley
Defendant:
Mary B. Kavaner, Elliot Spitzer, Department of Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ahlers v. Pataki et al
as 1:2008cv04593
Plaintiff:
Karl Ahlers
Defendant:
George Pataki, Elliot Spitzer, Lewis Opler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
