Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCCANN v. CHERNISKY et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff: LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant: THOMAS C. CHERNISKY, WARDEN SMITH, CAPTAIN WOLFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WARING v. CLARK et al
as 2:2020cv05494
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: MACEO EMERSON WARING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRANILLO-HERRERA v. LUMADUE et al
as 3:2017cv00127
Plaintiff: SAMUEL GRANILLO-HERRERA
Defendant: JULIE LUMADUE, M. MARTELL, R. SMERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BEGOLLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00881
Petitioner: EMERSON BEGOLLY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HIDALGO NEIRA v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00081
Plaintiff: JORGE HUMBERTO HIDALGO NEIRA
Defendant: GEO GROUP, INC., SEAN M. KUTA, NORENE GREENLEAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHBURG v. CAMERON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04748
Petitioner: EMERSON RICHBURG
Respondent: KENNETH CAMERON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHBURG v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2015cv00137
Plaintiff: EMERSON RICHBURG
Defendant: GERALD ROZUM, DANIEL GEHLMAN, J. MAZURKIEWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04992
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
McCauley v. Lamas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02386
Petitioner: Emerson McCauley
Respondent: Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Defendant: Timothy F. Geithner, Nancy D. Hogan, Bureau of Labor Statistics and others
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?