Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Lasley v. Neumann et al
as 0:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Edward Evan Lasley
Defendant:
Neumann, Mohamed, Rice County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Filiatrault v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Evan Gerald Filiatrault
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Ellison
as 0:2022cv02144
Petitioner:
Chester V. Jones
Respondent:
Keith Ellison, John Choi, Agent Drew Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Siddiqui et al v. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 0:2020cv01325
Petitioner:
M. Siddiqui, Kwasi Ampofo, Jose Hugo Pineda Mendoza and others
Respondent:
State Attorney Generals from MN and all other States, William Barr, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. USA
as 0:2020cv00633
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Malcolm Roy Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bishop v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2019cv00794
Defendant:
Nicole Smith, Chad Mesojedec, Jessica Geil and others
Plaintiff:
Merel Evans Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2017cv05015
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Daywitt, Merel Evans Bishop and Bet Elohim Congregation
Defendant:
Chad Mesojedec, Karen Dalluge, Jessica Geil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. United States of America
as 0:2017cv00705
Petitioner:
Corey Evans
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ahmed v. Lynch et al
as 0:2016cv02124
Petitioner:
Jama S. Ahmed
Respondent:
Loretta E. Lynch , Jeh Johnson and M. Yvonne Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fox v. Roy et al
as 0:2015cv02594
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Fox
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Penny Malecha, Harold W. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
