Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe-5 v. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00398
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B Adger, Ashley Finch and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Finch v. Southern Health Partners et al
as 0:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Charles B. Wester Detention Center, Aiken County Detention Center, Southern Health Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-4 v. South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services et al
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant:
George Willie Yeldell, Jerry B. Adger, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon Services and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McDaniel v. Saxon et al
as 2:2018cv01939
Plaintiff:
Roymad Shaquil McDaniel
Defendant:
K-9 Magnum, Richard A Finch, Jr, Anderson City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Finch v. McCormick Correctional Institution et al
as 4:2011cv00858
Plaintiff:
Profit J Finch
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, Warden Rushton, Warden Cartledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 4:2009cv02265
Plaintiff:
Profit J Finch
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Finch v. McCormick Correctional Institution
as 4:2009cv00487
Plaintiff:
Profit J Finch
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Finch v. McCormick Correctional Institution et al
as 4:2007cv00759
Plaintiff:
Profit J Finch
Defendant:
McCormick Correctional Institution, SCDC and NFN Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Finch v. Reed
as 9:2007cv00019
Petitioner:
Wilburn Roger Finch
Respondent:
Raymond Reed, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
