Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Finch v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Emanuel L Finch, Sr
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finch v. State of Washington
as 3:2022cv05255
Petitioner:
Emanuel Leonard Finch, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington and James Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Emanuel L Finch, Sr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finch v. Biller
as 2:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Emanuel L Finch, Sr
Defendant:
Susan Biller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. United States
as 2:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
Emanuel L Finch
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phillips v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2021cv05454
Defendant:
Patricia Finch, Angela Marie Avery, State of Washington and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Ervin Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2021cv05075
Defendant:
Dept of Assigned Counsel, Pierce County, K Richard Whitehead and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Leonard Finch, Sr and Emanuel Leonard Finch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Finch v. United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma
as 3:2019cv06131
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Leonard Finch, Sr
Defendant:
United States District Court Western District of Washington at Tacoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Nunes et al
as 4:2019cv05205
Plaintiff:
Joe J W Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Rob Jackson, Heidi Griffith, Ricardo Alaniz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Finch v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2019cv05675
Defendant:
K Richard Whitehead and Department of Assigned Counsel
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Finch and Emanuel Leonard Finch, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
