Cases 1 - 10 of 33
v. SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FORREST
as 2:2021cv02846
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, SCI FORREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00787
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, John Wetzel, Superintendant Thomas McGinley and others
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORREST v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01496
Respondent:
THOMAS MCGINLEY, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, JOHN WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2020cv00408
Respondent:
Superintendant Thomas McGinley, John Wetzel and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FORREST v. BEDELL et al
as 2:2019cv04204
Defendant:
DR. MOCLOCK, TONER, TRISHA KELLEY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FORREST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Theresa Delbalso, B. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Forrest v. Overmeyer et al
as 3:2014cv00934
Plaintiff:
Michael Forrest
Defendant:
Michael Overmeyer, Michael Tice, Lt. Murin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v UNKNOWN
as 2:2013cv01198
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
AN UNKNOWN NAMED NUMBER OF US POSTAL INSPECTORS, UNITED SAFETY SERVICE, DAVID ANDERCHAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v Unknown
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
An Unknown Named Number of US Postal Inspectors, United States Postal Inspection Service, David Anderchak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
