Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Mendoza-Gomez v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Francisco Mendoza-Gomez
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rojas v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05281
Petitioner:
Francisco Salgado Rojas
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barragan Jr v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Francisco Barragan Jr
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz-Nieto v. YCDOC et al
as 1:2023cv03156
Plaintiff:
Francisco Ruiz-Nieto
Defendant:
YCDOC and Yakima County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andres v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05897
Plaintiff:
Bismar Francisco Andres
Defendant:
Pierce County, Severson, C/O Desmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas Catano v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05332
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santiago Rosas Catano
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez-Aviles v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05254
Plaintiff:
Francisco D Lopez-Aviles
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrillo v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Carrillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carrillo v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00990
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Carrillo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Milton v. Quintana
as 4:2018cv05008
Petitioner:
Kyle David Milton
Respondent:
Francisco J Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
